Good news is that a few national guys have predicted Pettaway to OU, so it has a bit more heft than just the local guys. At the moment Pettaway doesn't appear swayed by Manning to Texas.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2023 Recruiting Class - #...............Discussion Thread
Collapse
First Unread Thread Button
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by LakelandSooner View PostIt could end up working out, but so far this staff's approach to recruiting isn't working.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LakelandSooner View PostIt could end up working out, but so far this staff's approach to recruiting isn't working.
We just have to hope that the available pool of really good players still exists in the fall.
But yeah, this approach could totally backfire. There is no denying that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by novasooner View PostGood news is that a few national guys have predicted Pettaway to OU, so it has a bit more heft than just the local guys. At the moment Pettaway doesn't appear swayed by Manning to Texas.Last edited by soonerbms; 06-23-2022, 06:52 PM.
Comment
-
OU has a 5 star QB in the boat, a blue chip RB committed that Bama wanted, Keyon Brown is blowing up (and had Bama, Auburn, and FSU offers.) Some of you guys need to relax. It's still early in the cycle. BV's staff already showed in the last cycle that they can recruit to Oklahoma. It's not like we're not in on elite guys. They just haven't pulled the trigger yet.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by camel at sea View PostOU has a 5 star QB in the boat, a blue chip RB committed that Bama wanted, Keyon Brown is blowing up (and had Bama, Auburn, and FSU offers.) Some of you guys need to relax. It's still early in the cycle. BV's staff already showed in the last cycle that they can recruit to Oklahoma. It's not like we're not in on elite guys. They just haven't pulled the trigger yet.
Comment
-
Originally posted by soonerbms View Post
Those crystal balls came before the Manning news. I doubt he’s still trending to us in wake of Texas getting Manning. We are getting smoked by schools that haven’t had the level of success we have. I’m trying to keep the faith, but this staff is not inspiring confidence at the moment.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by SoonerHank View Post
How do you know OU boosters won’t be able to do what they did at Clemson? That may have been true in the past but things are changing at OU too. Everyone at OU knows we either adapt or die in this environment. Do you think they’re going to quietly allow OU football to die? Do think they’re not aware of what it’s going to take to compete and win in the SEC?
You assume quite a bit. You’re looking backwards and trying to predict the future.Last edited by AppySooner; 06-23-2022, 10:14 PM.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by AppySooner View Post
You can already see it in how cautious OU is being with NIL. Tried to launch the collective and that immediately got reined in. You’ve heard nothing about that for a month or three. Same old OU. Leadership is essentially unchanged except Harroz and player-buying is below his pay grade. The attempts to compensate are getting hard to watch. We’re taking the team to the overpriced steakhouse and giving everyone high-tech recovery equipment and fitting them for suits because they aren’t just getting cash in their pockets. We could carve out a living in the old bagman days with a dynamic recruiter and 11 wins a year. I don’t know how that’ll hold up against the amounts being paid in the open now. These aren’t McDonald’s bags anymore.
https://thefootballbrainiacs.com/ope...june-23rd-26th
***But, as I’ve said before, this new NIL culture isn’t going to last. The NCAA is already making inquiries and it sounds like their recent inquiry into the situation at Miami has spooked Tennessee. Schools are beginning to understand that the compliance departments are going to be forced to justify that deals brought before them and approved are actual NIL deals and not inducements.
***Again, no need to worry until we see the product on the field. And, I continue to believe it’s going to be good.
***But I also want to offer some notes on why Venables may be turning down the NIL stuff and focusing on substantive recruiting.
***First, coach Venables is trying to build a particular culture and part of that happens in the recruiting process by figuring out what guys actually want.
***Secondly, some of these staffs that are making NIL promises are very likely making promises they can’t keep. And in a world when kids can transfer and play immediately, that short-term sugar high induced by fairy tales told in the recruiting process will cost, potentially big time, down the road. Venables knows he can build something that lasts and that isn’t going to happen by over-promising and under-delivering.
***Lastly, again, the NCAA is just beginning its inquiries. This isn’t the time to get caught with your hand in the cookie jar. Whatever you gain now, could not only cost you the recruit later but perhaps more.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by AdonijahAijalon View PostOU, Bama, and A&M are sitting at 37, 38, 47 at the moment. I'm not sure why there's panic in June. I'll save my fear for November and December.
Of course, many would bail by the week of Signing Day.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
BV has a vision for how he wants to coach. He's been mulling over that vision for at least a decade. He gets to try it his way. I'm a worrywart fan who is a bit skeptical about the approach in this day and age of college football, but if anybody can do it, it's Brent. He's a force of nature. And if he doesn't, I still respect the hell out of a man who refuses to sell out to common practice.
I disagree with some of TFB's framing: I don't think schools like Oregon are making empty NIL promises. I think recruits are getting bags up front, as well. Oregon has been the exact same annoyance for the past fifteen years or so. I also doubt that the NCAA will do anything substantial to stop the chaos. We have a free market AND an underground economy. It's wild out there.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by MichSooner View Post
There is panic in June of 2022 because LIAR would typically have locked up a bunch of 4 and 5 stars by now.
Of course, many would bail by the week of Signing Day.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by novasooner View PostBV has a vision for how he wants to coach. He's been mulling over that vision for at least a decade. He gets to try it his way. I'm a worrywart fan who is a bit skeptical about the approach in this day and age of college football, but if anybody can do it, it's Brent. He's a force of nature. And if he doesn't, I still respect the hell out of a man who refuses to sell out to common practice.
I disagree with some of TFB's framing: I don't think schools like Oregon are making empty NIL promises. I think recruits are getting bags up front, as well. Oregon has been the exact same annoyance for the past fifteen years or so. I also doubt that the NCAA will do anything substantial to stop the chaos. We have a free market AND an underground economy. It's wild out there.
The only thing that makes sense is that BV is first and foremost trying to develop a culture. His focus on that seems to be unyielding. The main concern would be that even if he instills that culture it may not translate to enough W's. Recruiting classes of high character guys that are like a high octane Iowa St just won't be good enough.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I follow recruiting at a fairly high level because the pieces move around so quickly that I just don't want to get too invested in it. The one thing that concerns me is that, while BV's approach will probably make it less likely for players to bail on signing day, there is a certain momentum that builds as players start giving their verbal commitments which causes other players to want to follow. I don't think that can happen as much in the "wait and see" method of recruiting. So certain schools are going to start seeing an avalanche of verbal commitments because "I want to play with that guy" is a real thing. And expecting to get an entire class of signing day flips from other schools is not a viable strategy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AppySooner View Post
You can already see it in how cautious OU is being with NIL. Tried to launch the collective and that immediately got reined in. You’ve heard nothing about that for a month or three. Same old OU. Leadership is essentially unchanged except Harroz and player-buying is below his pay grade. The attempts to compensate are getting hard to watch. We’re taking the team to the overpriced steakhouse and giving everyone high-tech recovery equipment and fitting them for suits because they aren’t just getting cash in their pockets. We could carve out a living in the old bagman days with a dynamic recruiter and 11 wins a year. I don’t know how that’ll hold up against the amounts being paid in the open now. These aren’t McDonald’s bags anymore.
Bama's current class is ranked below ours. Does anyone think they're not going to make a run? Same thing will happen here.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by camel at sea View PostBama's current class is ranked below ours. Does anyone think they're not going to make a run? Same thing will happen here.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by SoonerBurglar View Post
That's a little misleading. They are ranked below us because they only have five commits but their average commit is a 96.09 with additional CBs of players of that caliber. To have that as your average recruit is the elite of the elite. OU may end up hitting on some big time recruits but as of right now we have one top 50 player committed and one top 50 CB.
It's all going to even out by signing day. We're going to end up with a class the service rankings like, too.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by Widescreen View PostI follow recruiting at a fairly high level because the pieces move around so quickly that I just don't want to get too invested in it. The one thing that concerns me is that, while BV's approach will probably make it less likely for players to bail on signing day, there is a certain momentum that builds as players start giving their verbal commitments which causes other players to want to follow. I don't think that can happen as much in the "wait and see" method of recruiting. So certain schools are going to start seeing an avalanche of verbal commitments because "I want to play with that guy" is a real thing. And expecting to get an entire class of signing day flips from other schools is not a viable strategy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by camel at sea View Post
They've got five commits and we have 7. Bama wanted all three of our top three recruits. I'm not sure why Bates is rated where he is by the services because depending on who you listen to, he's one of, if not the best, center prospect in the '23 cycle. Two of the guys (McCarty/McIntyre) holding our average down are regional guys that our staff apparently really liked early on. It's pretty normal for guys who aren't camping in the SE to get overlooked by the services early in the process. Jaren Kanak - a guy BV went all the way to KS to look at from Clemson - was that type of guy in the '22 cycle. Another of the guys holding our average back is a 6'3" 200 lb safety from Virginia. They didn't have to offer or take him early, his measurables are elite... so that looks like another situation where our staff evals might be in front of the guys at Rivals and 247.
It's all going to even out by signing day. We're going to end up with a class the service rankings like, too.
Where was Isaiah Simmons ranked when BV grabbed him out of Kansas? Yeah he was a 3 star. Turned out pretty good. LOL
So much BS with rankings and stars... UGH
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by MichSooner View PostAnyone know how Venables approached recruiting while at Clemson? Did he tell the recuits not to commit until they had taken all of their visits? Did he give them the definition of the word, commitment?
Anyone know if Dabo had the same philosophy and practiced it with the entire team?
Comment
-
Originally posted by MichSooner View PostAnyone know how Venables approached recruiting while at Clemson? Did he tell the recuits not to commit until they had taken all of their visits? Did he give them the definition of the word, commitment?
Anyone know if Dabo had the same philosophy and practiced it with the entire team?
Comment
-
Originally posted by camel at sea View Post
They've got five commits and we have 7. Bama wanted all three of our top three recruits. I'm not sure why Bates is rated where he is by the services because depending on who you listen to, he's one of, if not the best, center prospect in the '23 cycle. Two of the guys (McCarty/McIntyre) holding our average down are regional guys that our staff apparently really liked early on. It's pretty normal for guys who aren't camping in the SE to get overlooked by the services early in the process. Jaren Kanak - a guy BV went all the way to KS to look at from Clemson - was that type of guy in the '22 cycle. Another of the guys holding our average back is a 6'3" 200 lb safety from Virginia. They didn't have to offer or take him early, his measurables are elite... so that looks like another situation where our staff evals might be in front of the guys at Rivals and 247.
It's all going to even out by signing day. We're going to end up with a class the service rankings like, too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AppySooner View Post
The thing about the evaluation guys is that if our coaches are right about them, they’ll end up with a lot more tempting offers than they had when they told OU they were ready to shut it down. Kid commits to OU when he has like three P5 offers, a year later Saban would like him to come down and take a look…we’re gonna say no?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Empire View PostJaydon Chatman to Texas. BB now 0-3 on three priority Oline prospects.
I’m all for giving him another chance under a new regime, but the results haven’t been pretty thus far. Kyle Flood is kicking his ass on the recruiting trail.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoomerAnon View Post
It's official Oklahoma is now a softball school
its concerning that we took the core of Clemson's defensive staff yet Clemsons defensive recruiting has chugged right along without missing a beat and ours is basically non-existent.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Empire View PostJaydon Chatman to Texas. BB now 0-3 on three priority Oline prospects.
I’m all for giving him another chance under a new regime, but the results haven’t been pretty thus far. Kyle Flood is kicking his ass on the recruiting trail.
Insiders keep telling us to be patient, but at some point, we’re going to have to land some blue chips. Is our staff not aware that Texas is getting whomever it wants this class?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by BirtDurglar View Post
Not panicking yet, but it looks pretty bad. We arent even on the eadar of any top recruits.
its concerning that we took the core of Clemson's defensive staff yet Clemsons defensive recruiting has chugged right along without missing a beat and ours is basically non-existent.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by really View PostHate to say if but if OU enters SEC with the same goody good shoes attitude they will be eaten alive
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by soonerbms View Post
Don't worry. We’re in the lead for Heath Ozeata, a guy who’s ranked 778th in the country on the On3 composite.
Insiders keep telling us to be patient, but at some point, we’re going to have to land some blue chips. Is our staff not aware that Texas is getting whomever it wants this class?
- Likes 2
Comment
-
We now have eight commits for the 2023 class. Jackson Arnold is the only one who’s ranked better than 400 in the On3 consensus of the four major recruiting sites. Four of the other seven are outside the top 500. The recent TE commitment is outside the top 1000. I really like Brent Venables, but I don’t understand his and his staff’s recruiting plan.
- Likes 3
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Go To Top
Collapse
Comment